Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Adenoviral (Ad) vectors and mRNA vaccines exhibit distinct patterns of immune responses and reactogenicity, but underpinning mechanisms remain unclear. We longitudinally compared homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 vaccination, focusing on cytokine-responsive innate-like lymphocytes—mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells and Vδ2 + γδ T cells—which sense and tune innate-adaptive cross-talk. Ad priming elicited robust type I interferon (IFN)–mediated innate-like T cell activation, augmenting T cell responses (innate-to-adaptive signaling), which was dampened at boost by antivector immunity. Conversely, mRNA boosting enhanced innate-like responses, driven by prime-induced spike-specific memory T cell–derived IFN-γ (adaptive-to-innate signaling). Extending the dosing interval dampened inflammation at boost because of waning T cell memory. In a separate vaccine trial, preboost spike-specific T cells predicted severe mRNA reactogenicity regardless of the priming platform or interval. Overall, bidirectional innate-like and adaptive cross-talk, and IFN-γ–licensed innate-like T cells, orchestrate interval-dependent early vaccine responses, suggesting modifiable targets for safer, more effective regimens.

Original publication

DOI

10.1126/sciimmunol.adu3337

Type

Journal article

Journal

Science Immunology

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Publication Date

29/08/2025

Volume

10