Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BackgroundIntra-operative ventilation using low/physiological tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with periodic alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARMs) is recommended in obese surgery patients.ObjectivesTo investigate the effects of PEEP levels and ARMs on ventilation distribution, oxygenation, haemodynamic parameters and cerebral oximetry.DesignA substudy of a randomised controlled trial.SettingTertiary medical centre in Geneva, Switzerland, between 2015 and 2018.PatientsOne hundred and sixty-two patients with a BMI at least 35 kg per square metre undergoing elective open or laparoscopic surgery lasting at least 120 min.InterventionPatients were randomised to PEEP of 4 cmH 2 O ( n  = 79) or PEEP of 12 cmH 2 O with hourly ARMs ( n  = 83).Main outcome measuresThe primary endpoint was the fraction of ventilation in the dependent lung as measured by electrical impedance tomography. Secondary endpoints were the oxygen saturation index (SaO 2 /FIO 2 ratio), respiratory and haemodynamic parameters, and cerebral tissue oximetry.ResultsCompared with low PEEP, high PEEP was associated with smaller intra-operative decreases in dependent lung ventilation [-11.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.7 to -13.7 vs. -13.9%; 95% CI -11.7 to -16.5; P  = 0.029], oxygen saturation index (-49.6%; 95% CI -48.0 to -51.3 vs. -51.3%; 95% CI -49.6 to -53.1; P  ConclusionIn obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery, intra-operative PEEP of 12 cmH 2 O with periodic ARMs, compared with intra-operative PEEP of 4 cmH 2 O without ARMs, slightly redistributed ventilation to dependent lung zones with minor improvements in peripheral and cerebral oxygenation.Trial registrationNCT02148692, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2.

Original publication

DOI

10.1097/eja.0000000000001741

Type

Journal article

Journal

European journal of anaesthesiology

Publication Date

11/2022

Volume

39

Pages

875 - 884

Addresses

From the Department of Anaesthesia, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, rue Gabriel-Perret-Gentil (CE, JD, AH, YA, ML), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (CE, ML), Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa (PP), Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy (PP), Pulmonary Engineering Group, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany (MGdA), Department of Outcomes Research (MGdA), Department of Intensive Care and Resuscitation, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA (MGdA), Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Pain Therapy, Bergmannstrost Hospital (HW), Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany (HW), Department of Intensive Care & Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (MJS).

Keywords

PROBESE investigators, of the PROtective VEntilation Network (PROVEnet); Clinical Trial Network of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC), Lung, Humans, Obesity, Oximetry, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Cerebrovascular Circulation