Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>The COVID-19 pandemic has created a sense of urgency in the research community in their bid to contribute to the evidence required for healthcare policy decisions. With such urgency, researchers experience methodological challenges to maintain the rigour and transparency of their work. With this in mind, we offer reflections on our recent experience of undertaking a rapid Cochrane qualitative evidence synthesis (QES).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>This process paper, using a reflexive approach, describes a rapid QES prepared during, and in response to, the COVID-19 pandemic.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper reports the methodological decisions we made and the process we undertook. We place our decisions in the context of guidance offered in relation to rapid reviews and previously conducted QESs. We highlight some of the challenges we encountered in finding the balance between the time needed for thoughtfulness and comprehensiveness whilst providing a rapid response to an urgent request for evidence.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>The need for more guidance on rapid QES remains, but such guidance needs to be based on actual worked examples and case studies. This paper and the reflections offered may provide a useful framework for others to use and further develop.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

Original publication

DOI

10.1186/s13643-020-01512-5

Type

Journal article

Journal

Systematic Reviews

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date

12/2020

Volume

9